Tuesday, February 22, 2011

On Sunday, Muammar Qadaffi's son, Saif El-Islam, gave a lengthy address to the nation with a level of geo-poilitical candor that one never hears from Western politicians. He explained the dire consequences of a civil war and likely East/West split of the nation, particularly as concerns its extensive oil reserves:

Saif El Islam Gadaffi addresses the nation - Part 2 of 3

Interestingly (at 13:30), he mentioned that the British foreign minister had contacted him... That would be William Hague, who earlier had falsely confirmed that his father was heading for Venezuela.

He then reminds the Lybian people that if civil war should ensue, look forward to the return of imperialism. He has a point: after all, Qadaffi in 2007 made a deal with the devil - British Petroleum, which had until then regarded December 7, 1971 as its day of infamy in Libya. Perhaps the "over $1 billion" for the concessions was still not a deal to BP's liking. And, considering BP's history with deals of this nature...

It could be that the Empire is up to its old tricks, though in this case they are hedging their bets with the "reformer" son. The son, in compliment, hedges his bets. After all, look at the company he keeps...

What is so deeply worrying is that he has tentacles deep in the heart of the British establishment. He has extremely powerful friends in Britain, among them Prince Andrew and the Rothschilds as well as Peter Mandelson.


There are many reports of hired mercenaries doing the killing. In the interest of epistemic caution, however, we should leave the question open as to who has hired these mercs. They are said to be everything from Ukranians, Italian mafia, and Sub-Saharan Africans speaking English and French...

Mercenary Ukrainian pilots are flying Libyan MiGs to fire on protesters in Tripoli,Italian mafia helping Moammar Gadhafi

According to a STRATFOR diplomatic source in the region, Ukrainian pilots are flying Libyan MiGs to fire on protesters in Tripoli.

The source claims the Italian mafia is also assisting the regime of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi and that boats operated by Italians have attacked demonstrators in Benghazi and Tripoli.

The source's information indicated that the Egyptian army has prevented a convoy of trucks carrying aid to Libya from crossing the border, as the Egyptian military is unhappy with potential regime change in Libya.

Witnesses say African mercenaries have been captured in Libya

What we do know is that they do not speak the local Arabic. Often, they speak English or French.

East of the country, mercenaries were hunted down by protesters with police help.... In Al Baida, Derna and Benghazi the family members of local police officers are taking part in the protests. Even in the army’s core, there are renown soldiers resigning across Benghazi and Sirte....

Today, these three towns were surrounded by mercenary troops. One of my sources in Benghazi told me that some of them were captured by protesters. That’s how we know that they’re from Chad or Mauritania. They’re dressed in military uniforms and they sometimes wear yellow helmets. They’re dressed like Gaddafi’s soldiers but they are black”.

In the video, the captured man answers questions being asked by the mob of protesters in Arabic.

A protester: “Who is giving you orders”?
The man: “They come from up high. I swear, I swear…orders, orders”.
A protester: “They told you to fire at us”?
The man: “Yes, yes”.

The mob begins to fight. Numerous voices begin to shout “no, don’t do that…make him talk. We cannot act like they do”.

Ghanain Mercenaries for Libya?

Ghanaians are being offered US$2500 dollars per day to go fight in Libya on behalf of the Gaddafi regime, according to rumors circulating in Accra.

It should be noted however, that there is a great deal of skepticism coming from the commenters on the above story...

OOOOH PLEASE! THEY ARE NOT EVEN COURAGEOUS ENOUGH TO CONFRONT THEIR NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOUR WAHALA AT IVORY COAST, TALK LESS OF GOING TO THE FAR AWAY LIBYA TO FIGHT. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Lybia denies use of mercenaries

Khaled Al Ga’aeem, under-secretary of the Libyan foreign ministry, phoned Al Jazeera on Monday evening. He was put live on air.

Here is a rough translation of the conversation that followed.

Al Jazeera: With us now is Khaled Gaeem, under-secretary of the foreign ministry. What’s your comment on what happened today in Libya?

Khaled Al Ga’aeem: "Good evening, the reason I am calling is to seek the truth and only the truth. I want stress two facts to the viewers in the Arab nation [world] - and especially to Libyans inside and outside Libya. And I take personal and full responsibility, and I am ready - not only to resign from my post - but also set myself on fire in the Green Square - if it is confirmed that there were mercenaries from African states coming by planes and if it is confirmed that there was aerial bombardment. And, by the way, I asked the British ambassador to be a witness and to bring a media crew tomorrow morning to tour all Tripoli to look for find any aftermath of aerial bombardment or discriminate bombardment. I will bear full responsibility and I will pay with my life as a price for it..."


So the case of Lybia illustrates why the blocking of foreign media has its disadvantages...

Lybia Conquered in the Dark

But then Mubarak would tell you it is a catch-22 situation.

===============

Update 3/6 12:57 PM: Foreign Secretary William Hague is reporting that the SAS troops as well as the diplomat “have now left Libya.” He insisted that the British government would send more diplomatic teams to East Libya “in due course.”

Sometimes no really means no.

That’s what the British military learned today when, after a solid week of Libyan rebel leaders insisting that they didn’t want any foreign intervention in the ongoing efforts to oust long-time dictator Moammar Gadhafi, they decided a great idea would be to dispatch a unit of their special forces, the SAS, to Benghazi to “offer help.”

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Killing Two Birds With One Eye

If these are the initiating shots of a new civil war, let the record show that the shadow government has fired first, aiming at the First and Second Amendments in particular.

There is no "smoking gun" to present as evidence, and we are not likely to find one. The people behind this event know that the American people are more aware of their methods than in the past. Even if the average American dismisses such conspiracy theories out of hand, they are nevertheless more familiar with the lexicon of terms like "programmed assassin" and "false flag" and when things like this happen they are more apt to look in the direction of "the grassy knoll" and "the dancing Israelis". So the cryptocratic operators are more careful to cover their tracks now - they know they might not get away with a Kennedy assassination, or perhaps even a 9/11 today.

Once again we have a lone nut, yet unlike previous lone nuts this one does not appear to have any kind of military or intelligence back round, nor has he spent any time in a mental health institution. Yet he displays the classic symptoms of a mind controlled assassin.(1) It is just unclear how and when he might have been recruited for this particular mission. Admittedly, there isn't much here for conspiracy theorists to go on...

Yet context gives away the game. The detail to which this event fits the narrative of the interested parties is extraordinary, from the victim born on 9/11 to the Congresswoman whose nickname is "Gabby" reading the First Amendment concerning the right to free speech on the House floor just two days before being shot through the side of the brain affecting speech(2).

But the first piece of the narrative was the media script that immediately related this event to the health care debate when in fact the 112th Congress was scheduled to debate the repeal of the health care bill on Wednesday (now postponed and sure to be "toned down"). We noticed in the first reports that the media machine was automatically blaming the Tea Party, "Obamacare" opponents and the like, with talk radio and the Internet fingered as the weapons of mass destruction, and Sarah Palin identified as Public Enemy #1.(3)

AP: Giffords has drawn the ire of the right in the last year, especially from politicians like Sarah Palin, over her support of the health care bill. It is not clear whether the gunman had the health care debate in mind or was focused on his own unique set of political beliefs as witnessed in the Internet videos.

Well, since he does not even mention heath care in his videos, perhaps it has nothing to do health care, and instead has everything to do with the themes mentioned in his videos, and particularly mind control and "conscience" dreaming.

Curiously, the same sort of flawed, opportunistic inferences that we find in the quoted AP article is employed by "Classitup10" - a sloppy application of modus ponens syllogisms...

If you create one new language then you're able to create a second new language.

If you're able to create a second new language then you're able to create a third new language.

You create one new language.

Thus you're able to create a third new language.

So long as these "languages" are unspecified, this reasoning is rather vapid.(4) But by plugging in concrete examples, what this video presents is a structure of forward chaining. While forward chaining has applications in artificial intelligence (AI), we ponder that AI might be induced not in silicon computers, but in human "wet-ware". Suppose that the "Classitup10" Youtube page was not created by Loughner, but for Loughner, and that these videos provide him - "listener" - with general instructions for reading and inferring from remotely communicated signals. As the Wikipedia article notes: "One of the advantages of forward-chaining... is that the reception of new data can trigger new inferences, which makes the engine better suited to dynamic situations in which conditions are likely to change."

The vapid generality of these instructions give no clue as to which specific triggers to await, but the handler may need not to provide these, since the subject can be relied upon to provide his own language. Hence his handler need only read his various Internet postings in order to determine the optimal triggering image or phrase. Call this a more "organic" form of mind control, and certainly this is a method much more feasible for the "faceborg" generation. So elsewhere in the Loughner "literature" we find some possibilities. The text accompanying the flag on Loughner's "Starhitshnaz" channel concerns the "rarest bird on earth.... It's with one large red eye with a light blue iris"...

There's a new bird on my right shoulder. The beak is two feet and lime green. The rarest bird on earth, there's no feathers, but small grey scales all over the body. It's with one large red eye with a light blue iris. The bird feet are the same as a woodpecker. This new bird and there's only one, the gender is not female or male. The wings of this bird are beautiful; 3 feet wide with the shape of a bald eagle that you could die for. If you can see this bird then you will understand. You think this bird is able to chat about a government?
I want you to imagine a comet or meteoroid coming through the atmosphere.
On the other hand, welcome yourself to the desert: Maybe your ability to protest is from the brainwash of the current government structure.

It is worth mentioning the mysterious dead bird drops that occurred around the world the previous week. But, we find a more direct match for Loughner's imagery in the Astronomy Picture of the Day posted on the morning of January 8th...




So the forward chaining might go something like this...

If you see the large red eye with a light blue iris, then there is a new bird on your right shoulder.

If there is a new bird on your shoulder, then the bird is able to chat (or "gab"?) about a government (with a "meteoroid" coming through the atmosphere?)

You see the large red eye with a light blue iris.

Go and "chat" with a government...


Very well, our speculations are running very far out on a limb now, so let us come back down to earth...

While we are being told that Loughner had "slipped through the cracks" and hadn't been given any mental health treatment, there is apparently some inconsistency in that claim. According to a local blog, The Cholla Jumps...

Jared Loughner has been making death threats by phone to many people in Pima County including staff of Pima Community College, radio personalities and local bloggers. When Pima County Sheriff’s Office was informed, his deputies assured the victims that he was being well managed by the mental health system.

Moreover, there is a memo leaked to Greta van Susteren alleged to come from the Department of Homeland Security which suggests that there may have been interventions by unknown parties. (As Sipsey Street Irregulars & Talking Points Memo note, it wasn't a DHS memo, but some of the points were provided by DHS.) The following point in particular, however, appears to be speculative on the part of the investigator, and may lead to Loughners handlers...

* the suspect has multiple arrests ... But no criminal record? Intervention by someone?

And also...

It did just come in from the command post, that the federal judge was Not originally scheduled to attend the meeting, according to wife. She stated that he received a phone call about an hour before and was invited to attend. Wrong place - wrong time.

(An aside, the phrase "wrong place wrong time" also occurs in this KYMA report)

Who made that call?

John Roll was the victim who, considering his position as a district court federal judge, has received surprisingly little attention from the media, comparatively speaking. Perhaps this is because his actions as judge do not fit the narrative that the interested parties wish to broadcast, though certainly his death will facilitate those same interests. He is considered a friend of the Second Amendment (as is Giffords). In particular, he is well regarded by gun rights advocate Sheriff Richard Mack for his ruling in Mack's case which effectively killed the Brady Bill in the 1990's.



But it gets better...

The E.U.Times reports: Top US Federal Judge Assassinated After Threat To Obama Agenda

A Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the top US Federal Judge for the State of Arizona was assassinated barely 72-hours after he made a critical ruling against the Obama administrations plan to begin the confiscation of their citizen’s private retirement and banking accounts in order to stave off their nations imminent economic collapse, and after having the US Marshals protecting him removed.

Now the plot thickens...

_________________

1. He has apparently activited a "lock-down" program in the case of his survival, sitting in his cell, starring at the wall with his infamous smirk: Loughner's Smirk Behind Bars. Also, Judy Clarke, an attorney with a history of handling similar cases such as that of MK-ULTRA subject Ted Kaczinsky, has assumed Loughner's defense.

2. Her injury was fortuitous in that the bullet passed only through one side - the left - of her brain. As the brain is largely redundant between the two hemispheres, patients have been known to lose an entire hemisphere and yet remain somewhat functional. However, there are two regions where the human brain is asymmetrical: Wernicke's area on the right temporal side, and Broca's area on the left temporal side. These control comprehension and construction of language respectively. So, while Gifford's prospects for recovery are good, it is her speech that will be most problematic.

3. Lyndon LaRouche noticed this as well...

LaRouche said today that the version of the story about the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Arizona on Saturday presented thus far is not believable. On the one hand, it is clear that the perpetrator who was apprehended is a nutty kid. On the other hand, the targeting of Sarah Palin is a tip off that the story is a fake and that someone is using the kid who carried out the shooting.

4. The same logic is applied to religions (1, 2 & 3) and currencies (1, 2 & 3) - the latter of course indicates that not only has the media adopted Loughner's brand of reasoning, but so has the Federal Reserve (i.e. quantitative easing)!

Saturday, November 20, 2010

The present policy of benign false flag terrorism began with the Air Force One fly-over of lower Manhattan on April 27, 2009. It then continued over the course of the first two years of the Obama administration with numerous botched and intercepted terrorist attacks. The policy is to achieve political and economic goals by exploiting fear without culling casualties.

A case in point: the Christmas day underwear bomber, contributing to the economic goals of the scanner industry.

Lately there has been a good deal of public backlash on this front, with many travellers vowing to go "pre-Wright Bros." It almost seems as if the purposes were to quash travel and kill the commercial airline industry. But some have speculated that the ultimate purpose of the outrages in airports is to generate public support for a biometric ID program, replacing one physically invasive security procedure with an unnoticeable, but more penetrating interrogation.

But the most recent botched attacks indicate that a greater purpose is to dominate commerce itself.

First it was the Yemen-sent package bombs, intercepted and identified of their blatant addressees: Chicago synagogues. Now this: Germany on high alert; Namibian fake bomb suspect arrested

The opportunity arising from this scare is seized by the interests of a TSA program directed towards the shipping industry.

TSA Certified Cargo Screening Program

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

This Time The World

Let men say what they will, I say that as surely as the sun in the heavens once shone upon Britain and America united, so surely is it one morning to rise, to shine upon, to greet again the reunited states—the British-American Union.

-Andrew Carnegie, as quoted in...

REMARKS
of
HON. J. THORKELSON
OF MONTANA
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Monday, August 19.1940

To expand upon these remarks, it might be said that in the 20th Century, following World War II, the British Empire went bloodied but unbowed in relinquishing direct control over much of its colonial territory while retaining a "merely" nominal claim on its commonwealth. Britain's imperial ambition retreated into a state of latency. Of late, however, there have been some audacious indications of a desire that this latency should end...

William Hague has outlined the Government's vision of Britain's role in the world, promising a sweeping overhaul of foreign policy aimed at expanding the country's influence to every inhabited continent.

And so just following the United States 234th annual celebration of independence, Elizabeth II came to the United States in order to address the United Nations, of which, it is noted, she "nominally" holds a considerable fraction.

The significance of this speech is examined in a rant of Joan M. Veon at Rense...

...the physical structure of the United Nations and its agenda represents the completion of the dream and aspirations of British aristocrat Cecil Rhodes to return the United States and the rest of the world back under British rule. He felt that "too little of the globe was British territoryand if we had retained Americathere would be millions more of English living."

In Rhode's 1877 will, it says

"the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire, the consolidation of the whole Empire, the inauguration of a system of colonial Representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed Members of the Empire," which may well ultimately be achieved, by the Roundtable which "publicized the idea of and the name `British Commonwealth of Nations.'"

Oftentimes, nowadays, Americans behave as if they are the Queen's subjects. The "special relationship" of the "USUK" has entangled the two in more than a few foreign mis-adventures, most recently of course in Iraq & Afghanistan. Then there is the accusation of Lyndon LaRouche that President Obama is in fact a British agent. On the cultural side, take a look at federally tax-funded public television, and note how much of its programming is of boring British fare.

On a more symbolical level, however, we have this recent addition to the skyline of Cincinnati, a Mid-West city named after a military society of veterans of the American Revolution, but sometimes known as the "Queen City"...

Workers will soon place the crowning tiara atop the Queen City Tower.

The "Grand Tiara" will be hoisted into place Tuesday by cranes to the highest point on the $322 million downtown skyscraper.

The 15,000-pound steel structure is intended as a tribute to the late Princess Diana.

Princess Diana has been in the news in other respects lately...

Princess Di's Scandalous Black Gown Auctioned for 276,000

A black-gowned princess, like the oil-coated pelicans on the Gulf coast...

Then there is the performance of Lady Gaga before the Queen Elizabeth late last year, where she had planned to commit virtual self-immolation before Her Majesty, as she had done at the MTV music awards to the song Paparazzi. Indeed, such a performance would have been intensely scandalous, especially in light of the circumstances of Diana's death (hounded as she was by the paparazzi). In any case, Lady Gaga met the Queen dressed as her predecessor, but in blood-red latex, like a pelican suffocating in red crude...

Gaga's Crown Yule

Sunday, June 6, 2010

The British Empire Answers the Tea Party of Boston Harbor, 1773



Queen Elizabeth I - The Pelican Portrait

In this portrait of the queen, aged about 41, she is treated almost like a religious icon. Elaborate symbolism and rich detail show off her status and royal qualities... The mother pelican on her brooch is a traditional Christian symbol of Christ's sacrifice. It was believed that the pelican fed her young with her own blood...



Queen Bess Island pelican rookery affected by oil

(June 3, 2010) Today, driven by strong winds and weather, oil impacted the Queen Bess Island Pelican Rookery which resulted in 60 birds, including 41 pelicans being coated with oil...

And so it was precisely on Queen Elizabeth II's 84th birthday, April 21st 2010, 3AM Greenwich Mean Time, that an explosion occurred on British Petroleum's Deepwater Horizon...

The Queen was born at 2.40am on 21 April 1926 at 17 Bruton Street in Mayfair, London.

The rig was in the Mississippi Canyon area of the Gulf of Mexico when the blast occurred at 10 p.m. CDT Tuesday (0300 GMT Wednesday).





Subsequently, millions upon millions of gallons of crude oil have been spilled into the Gulf. This then is the British retort to the Boston Tea Party of 1773. 237 years separate these events, yet they both implicate differing forms of corporate welfare. The former was a rejection of the favorable tax policy instituted on behalf of the East India Company, which had been given a monopoly of tea importation to the American colonies...

In an effort to prop up the financially troubled East India Company, Parliament passed the Tea Act, granting it a virtual monopoly over the British tea market and allowing direct sales access to the colonies (colonial merchants were cut out of the loop entirely). As a consequence, East India Company tea cost the least of any available tea, foreign or domestic. Following the retention of the 3 pence Townshend duty on tea in 1770, colonists had generally boycotted British brands, turning instead to contraband Dutch brews. An estimated 90 percent of all tea consumed in the colonies was of the Dutch variety, so patriots could sip cheaply while avoiding the despised revenue duty altogether. Now, even with the Townshend duty added, East India tea remained the least expensive. Because the tax seemed "hidden" in this manner, colonists viewed the Tea Act as an underhanded way to foist the tax, and Parliamentary taxation power, onto the colonies.


In 2010, though not a monopoly, BP is the leading producer of oil and natural gas in the United States and the largest investor in U.S. energy development. As such, BP stood to receive the greatest benefit from the 2005 Energy Policy Act, which gave tax and royalty relief to companies drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, as reported in the L.A.Times article: Oil companies have a rich history of U.S. subsidies.


Moreover, BP stands to recieve corporate welfare as a result of the situation it has created in the Gulf. Hans Bader explains in OpenMarket.org...

President Obama, the biggest recipient of campaign cash from BP, is using BP’s oil spill to push for a global warming bill that is chock full of corporate welfare and environment-destroying ethanol subsidies. And the bill is one crafted by lobbyists for big companies like BP: “For years, BP has lobbied for climate change legislation, until recently running around with the U.S. Climate Action Partnership.”

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Obama Baits Civil War

Since the beginning of his presidential bid (Wilmette), Obama has frequently implied self-comparisons and invited media-assisted comparisons (Newsweek, CBS, L.A. Times) to Lincoln. Now, in a Christian Science Monitor headline, we find another point of similarity: States Rebel Against Washington

With the passage and signing of the "ObamaCare" bill, the states - beginning with Virginia - have been moved to assert the rights of their citizens over the federal law, particularly on the issue of the individual mandate.

Speaker Pelosi's butchering of the words of that venerable Virginian, Thomas Jefferson, warrant special attention. In a disgusting paraphrase from the Declaration of Independence, she said:

...we will honor the vows of our founders, who in the Declaration of Independence said that we are ‘endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ This legislation will lead to healthier lives, more liberty to pursue hopes and dreams and happiness for the American people.


But, if delivered with honesty, here is how the speech would have went...

Herewith is established a C change in American sovereignty. Now with this act of Congress - however shamefully it was executed - the Federal Government now has a stake in the maintenance of the very bodies of each and every one of the U.S. citizenry. Henceforth, the citizen is a subject, on this most fundamental level. People of America, go to hellth with your unalienable rights. Your life is a ward of the state. Your happiness consists in the pursuit of hellth insurance. Your are at liberty to choose government sanctioned hellth care.

Never mind the Constitution. The Declaration of Independence is Null and Void!